START YOUR PROJECT
SIPENG CNC logo SIPENG CNCExpert in Advanced Manufacturing
Home / Case Studies / Case Study on the Machining of Copper Rotor Bars for Submersible Pump Motors

Case Study on the Machining of Copper Rotor Bars for Submersible Pump Motors

SIPENG CNC developed an automatic CNC turning solution for machining both ends of copper rotor bars used in submersible pump motors. The solution combines dedicated feeding, workholding and internal guidance to improve production output, machining consistency and handling of long copper profiles.

Case Study on the Machining of Copper Rotor Bars for Submersible Pump Motors

Copper rotor bars are the electrical conductors of submersible pump motor rotors. The motor works downhole in the oil well, submerged in production fluid, where the rotor bars carry the full motor current and any inconsistency in the bars is amplified into vibration, noise and premature bearing wear. The bars are long, soft and easily deformed, which makes their end machining a dedicated production problem rather than a general turning job.

Submersible pump motor application in oil wells
Application context: submersible pump motors operate downhole, where rotor bar quality directly affects motor life.

Project Overview

The customer machines shaped (profiled) copper rotor bars for submersible pump motor rotors, drawn from T1 and T2 copper. Both ends of every bar must be turned into a cylindrical seat of Ø5.23 mm × 16.5 mm, and the bars delivered for this project range from 352 mm to 612 mm in length.

Profiled T1/T2 copper rotor bar with machined end
T1/T2 drawn copper rotor bars — the shaped cross-section carries direction, so orientation must stay consistent through feeding and clamping.
Customer part drawing No. 51263 of the copper rotor bar
Customer part drawing (No. 51263): both ends turned to a Ø5.23 mm cylindrical seat, overall length 352–612 mm depending on the motor model.

What makes these parts difficult is not the end turning itself, but everything around it: getting bars of different lengths to enter the spindle smoothly, holding a directional profile reliably, and protecting the soft copper surface through handling and transfer between operations. SIPENG CNC configured the solution around the bar cross-section, the length range and the two-end requirement — an automatic feeding CNC lathe with profile-matched collets and internal spindle guidance, arranged as two machines each dedicated to one end.

The Original Method and Its Bottlenecks

The customer previously ran two simple bench lathes, with two operators machining one end each. Based on the customer's own production records, the line produced about 500 pieces per 8 hours at roughly 90% yield.

Original simple bench lathe used for end machining
The original bench lathes: manual feeding, positioning and infeed depended entirely on the operator.

The original method had four main problems:

1. Operator-dependent consistency — feeding, positioning and infeed all relied on the person at the machine, so the operating rhythm and machining state were hard to keep uniform across a shift and across operators.

2. Awkward handling of long bars — at up to 612 mm, manual loading and unloading required the operator to support the bar and control its direction at the same time, adding auxiliary time to every piece.

3. Handling damage between operations — bars passed through loading, first-end machining, reorientation, second-end machining and collection, with repeated pick-and-place and intermediate stacking that risks dents and scrap on soft copper.

4. No stable coolant condition — the original machines could not apply cutting fluid, so tool and workpiece conditions were unstable. The new layout brings coolant into the machine configuration together with CNC-controlled feeds.

The New Layout: Two Machines, One End Each

For parts that need turning on both ends, the layout uses two automatic-feeding CNC lathes in sequence: the first machine completes one cylindrical end, then the bar is reoriented and loaded into the second machine for the other end.

Each machine carries a fixed operation, so positioning, tooling and the part program are set once per machine. Every bar is still clamped twice in total — one clamping per machine — and the improvement lies in feeding, machining control and simplified transfer between the two operations. This is deliberately not a "both ends in one setup" solution, and not an unmanned continuous line: the reorientation and transfer between machines remain manual steps by design.

Two automatic feeding CNC lathes arranged in sequence
The two-machine layout on the customer's shop floor: one end per machine, with a defined transfer between them.

Key Engineering Details

Profile-matched collets — location built from the bar cross-section

The bar has a directional, non-round cross-section, so the workholding must match the profile itself. The dedicated collets are bored to the bar section and close through elastic slitting. Bars are loaded with a consistent orientation — small end down, large end up — so feeding, locating and clamping all repeat in the same relationship.

Shaped cross-section of the copper rotor bar
The shaped bar cross-section: the collet bore and the loading orientation are both defined by this profile.

Spindle guidance — supporting the length range, not just the longest bar

Inside the spindle, a guide tube carries the bar as it enters and passes through. Commissioning showed that the shortest bars (352 mm) place different demands on the guide tube length and its fit with the collet, so the collet and guide configuration were adjusted together. The practical lesson from this project: feeding must be verified at both extremes of the length range, not only with the longest bar — infeed, locating and clamping state all need checking before the solution's applicable range is confirmed.

Spindle guide tube inside the CNC lathe
Internal spindle guidance supports the bar through the spindle; collet and guide tube are configured together for the 352–612 mm range.

CNC feeds and coolant — a stable process instead of a practiced hand

Infeed is controlled by the CNC program and cutting fluid is applied in the enclosure, giving the tool and workpiece a stable thermal and frictional condition. The effect shows up in the customer's output and yield figures below; since the customer has not supplied tolerance, surface-finish or tool-life records for this project, no additional claims are made on those metrics.

Process Flow

Blank picking → bars loaded into the first machine's magazine with the profile direction as specified → automatic feeding and first-end machining → bar reoriented and loaded into the second machine → second-end machining → finished bars collected and stored.

The point of this sequence is to keep bar direction, machining order and collection unambiguous, and to remove unnecessary intermediate stacking and repeated handling. Transfer and reorientation between the two machines remain part of the process and are accounted for in the customer's production figures.

Loading a long copper rotor bar into the feeding magazine
Loading with a consistent profile direction: small end down, large end up, so every bar is clamped in the same relationship.
Automatic feeding CNC lathe with bar magazine
One of the two automatic-feeding lathes: the magazine and feed mechanism present each bar to the collet in a fixed orientation.

Results

From the customer's own production records on this project:

Original method: about 500 pieces per 8 hours, yield around 90%. New layout: over 1,200 pieces per 8 hours, yield around 99%.

These figures reflect the application result at the customer's site; the counting conditions and product mix are subject to the customer's production records. Because the customer's operator arrangement for the new layout is not yet finalized, no labor-saving ratio is derived from this project.

Project Value

The core of this project is turning a long-profile bar requirement into a matched set of machine, feeding, workholding and process configurations: the profile-matched collet builds location from the bar section, the spindle guide adapts to the length range, automatic feeding removes manual auxiliary operations, and two machines in sequence complete the two ends with fixed, repeatable conditions.

For similar long-profile parts, machine selection should evaluate cross-section, length range, end-machining requirement and inter-operation transfer together — only when these conditions are verified as a set does the output improvement become sustainable.

Send us your part drawing, material grade, bar section, length range and production target, and SIPENG CNC will evaluate the machine, feeding, workholding, tooling and process configuration for your application.

Other Solutions

SUS306L Gate Valve Stem Tapered Square Machining
SUS306L Gate Valve Stem Tapered Square Machining

A CNC squaring machine with a dedicated clamping sub-sleeve, spindle taper support and indexable tooling cut the tapered-square cycle on SUS306L gate valve stems from about 3 minutes to 1 minute 20 seconds per piece, with one operator now covering three machines.

View solution →
Case Study on the Machining of Copper End Rings for Submersible Pump Motor Rotors
Case Study on the Machining of Copper End Rings for Submersible Pump Motor Rotors

SIPENG CNC developed a drilling and chamfering solution for copper end rings used in submersible pump motor rotors, combining CNC machining, through-spindle coolant and dedicated fixtures to address chip wrapping, manual clamping and repetitive handling.

View solution →
Submersible Pump Motor Rotor Assembly Outer Diameter Machining Case Study
Submersible Pump Motor Rotor Assembly Outer Diameter Machining Case Study

To address issues such as tool switching, repeated alignment, and handling-induced damage during the machining of the outer diameter of submersible pump motor rotor assemblies, this case study reconfigures the machine tool, internal bore clamping method, and workpiece handling process, enabling continuous external turning in a single setup while protecting the machined surfaces.

View solution →
Bicycle Bottom Bracket Spindle End Machining Automation Case Study
Bicycle Bottom Bracket Spindle End Machining Automation Case Study

A pipe fitting manufacturer replaced scattered manual lathes with a cell of CNC lathes fed by bar feeders. Process planning, tooling packages, part programs and operator training were delivered with the machines, so fitting blanks now move through the cell on a fixed, repeatable route.

View solution →
Prestressed Anchorage Wedge External Taper Machining Automation Case Study
Prestressed Anchorage Wedge External Taper Machining Automation Case Study

An elevating feeder and dual-channel CNC lathe were added to automate handling for prestressed anchorage wedge turning. The customer reports about 20 seconds per part in the original process and about 14 seconds in the new process; the time scope and production results should be verified on a consistent basis.

View solution →
Integrated Bicycle Disc Brake Rotor Internal Thread Machining
Integrated Bicycle Disc Brake Rotor Internal Thread Machining

CNC turning case study for a one-piece bicycle disc brake rotor. A dedicated fixture supports the perforated rotor web, approximately 1.8 mm thick, during internal-thread and face machining in one setup. The customer reports an 18-second cycle time; the timing scope and dimensional basis require confirmation.

View solution →
Automated Feeding and Turning for a Shock Absorber Locating Sleeve
Automated Feeding and Turning for a Shock Absorber Locating Sleeve

An automatic feeding system was integrated with a CNC lathe to machine deep-drawn shock absorber locating sleeves. The original turning process already used one setup but required manual loading and unloading. The customer reports a change from about 10 to 7 seconds per part and one operator tending four to six machines; production conditions should be verified.

View solution →
Automated Turning of Automotive Welding Locating Pins
Automated Turning of Automotive Welding Locating Pins

Precision machining solutions for titanium and aerospace aluminum components with complex geometries and demanding tolerances.

View solution →

Frequently Asked Questions

I can provide drawings, material and blank specifications. Can you recommend the right machine and machining route?
Yes — that is exactly how we start. Send the drawing (PDF, DWG or STEP), material grade, blank dimensions, key tolerances and your target output. Our engineers review the part geometry and process, then recommend a machine model, fixture concept and machining route, together with an estimated cycle time. We reply with a written evaluation and quotation within 24 hours.
Can my part be completed in one setup? Which operations would need other equipment?
It depends on geometry, size and accuracy, so we answer this per part, not in general. After reviewing your drawing we reply in writing: which operations are completed in one clamping, which need a second operation or a different machine, and what the recommended process chain looks like. If a part genuinely needs two setups, we say so instead of promising one-setup results.
Are cutting tools, fixtures, bar feeder and CNC programs included?
They can all be included — the delivery scope is defined line by line in our quotation. A typical turnkey package covers the machine, fixtures designed for your parts, the tooling package, bar feeder integration and CAM programs for your parts, plus a recommended consumables list. If you prefer machine only, or want to keep your existing tooling, the scope is adjusted and every included and excluded item is listed before you sign.
How do you evaluate the machining time for my parts?
We build the process route first, then calculate cycle time from tool paths and cutting data, and cross-check it with CAM simulation. The estimated time per part is stated in the proposal. During trial cutting the actual cycle time is measured; the measured result — not the paper estimate — is the basis for acceptance, so the number you plan production around is a verified one.
Can you run trial cutting with my own material?
Yes, and we recommend it. You send material or blanks; after the machine, fixtures and programs are ready we machine your parts, record cutting parameters, cycle time and tool behaviour, and provide a trial report with measurement results, photos and video. The trial schedule is agreed with you in advance, so you can attend in person or follow it remotely.

HAVE A PART TO PRODUCE?
LET'S BUILD THE RIGHT SOLUTION.

Send us your part drawing, material, tolerance and production requirements. Our team will evaluate the application and recommend the right machine, process and automation configuration.

SEND YOUR PART DRAWING

Share your part and production requirements. Our team will review the application and recommend the next step.

Drawing upload (optional) — supported: PDF, STEP, STP, IGES, DWG, DXF, JPG, PNG, ZIP, DOC, XLS · up to 50MB